Over a considerable period of time, there has been the debate on the maiden person to reach the North pole and continue to remain contentious in the history of exploration. The bone of contention has been trying to separate two U.S. explorers and their proponents purporting to be the maiden persons’ to reach the North Pole. Between Robert Peary and Fredrick Cook, who became the first person to reach the North Pole? Much as we talk about the exploration of the North Pole, the answer to this question may not be as mentioned above. According to one historical researcher, who expound on the great contentious issue about the first person to reach North pole, concurred that substantial proof found out from diaries of the said explorers, an account of companion, prove that neither men stood way above the peak as they do claim. As a matter of fact, what the expedition papers show with regards to the maiden person to reach the North Pole is that they made authentic attempts to reach the pole in the wake of the 20th century. However, they experienced great challenges during their expedition from the harsh weather condition in the Arctic and restraints of the navigational equipment of the time.

Further over the period of time, the controversy about the first person to reach the North Pole former Peary’s assertions was endorsed by The Times as well as authenticated by the National Geographic Society is the sponsoring of his expedition.

Subsequently, the American Congress elevated Peary to rear admiral giving him a suchlike pension. Based on claims on the first person to reach the North Pole, Peary’s assertion undoubtedly looked stronger compared to Cook’s, whose compatriot attested to his fraud regarding his expeditions to the pole. Meanwhile, as researchers expounded on the first person to reach the North Pole, there were suspicions regarding Peary’s scanty records then, and the skepticism escalated when they took emphasis on the navigational methodologies used.

In addition, a book by one of the authors about whether it was the fact or fiction with regards to the first person to reach the North Pole entitled “pole-in-one” believed to be good to be genuine. Needless to say, proponents of Peary as the first person to reach the North Pole were optimistic that he would be exculpated when British explorer was permitted to access former unsighted material from Peary’s archives. Undoubtedly, the British explorer (Herbert) wasn’t convinced enough by the newly found evidence concerning the first person to reach the North Pole. Herbert who had been invited by the National Geographic Society to expound on the Peary’s assertion of being the first person to reach the North Pole didn’t acknowledge his analysis as such.

This controversy about the first person to reach the North Pole led to another expert who was a librarian, Mr. Bryce, to take interest in expounding on Cook’s biography. Remarkably, he was permitted to access personal documents of Cooks in order to make his own preservations. He began by finding evidence reinforcing Dr. Cook assertion and in investigating the explorer’s letters and journals alongside others, he found out that some of the information was doctored and erased. Nevertheless, the debate about the first person to reach the North Pole, based on Cook’s assertions continuous to be contentious as apparently, he manipulated dates to match the claimed observations. There are those to the opinion that Cook’s claims are more convincing much than Peary’s. Others team led by Will Seger who became the first person to reach the North Pole after Peary-Cook shows that the controversy may never be determined.

In relation to the first person to reach the North Pole, far-reaching claims suggest that Admiral Peary fared much better than his competitor. According to Bryce’s book, Cook seemed to have relied much on Admiral Peary. As we end this controversial debate about who is the first person to reach the North Pole, both the explorers can be compared to Siamese twins when you separate them from each other you lose some crucial parts of each.